Question:
If the Imaam is sitting while leading the Jama’ah (congregational) prayer, should the Ma’mum also follow him in sitting?
Answer:
Bismillahi wassalatu wassalaamu alaa rasoolillahi amma ba’ad,
The evidence related to this issue is the following Ahadith:
On the authority of Anas رضي الله عنه:
Allah’s Apostle ﷺ fell from a horse and got injured, so he led the prayer sitting and we also prayed sitting. When he completed the prayer he said, “The Imam is to be followed; if he says Takbir then say Takbir, bow if he bows; raise your heads when he raises his head, when he says, ‘Samiallahu liman hamida’ say, ‘Rabbana lakal hamd’, and prostrate when he prostrates”
[Sahih Al Bukhari, Hadith 700]
On the authority of Aisha رضي الله عنها:
“He ﷺ prayed sitting during the illness of which he died. He also prayed sitting on another occasion before that, when he was injured, and the people behind him prayed standing; so he indicated to them to sit, so they sat (and prayed). When he finished, he said, you were going to do as the Persians and the Romans do; stand for their kings who sit. So do not do so, for the Imaam is there to be followed; when he makes Rukoo (bowing), make Rukoo, when he rises, rise, and when he prays sitting, pray sitting.”
[Sahih Muslim]
There is a big Khilaaf (difference of opinion) on this matter and the three different opinions are as follows:
a) The Ma’mum should follow the Imaam in sitting if the Imaam sits in prayer, and this is the opinion of the Ahnaaf.
b) The Ma’mum should not follow the Imaam if he is sitting and so if he sits the Ma’mum have to stand. This is the opinion of the majority of the Ulamaa such as Al Humaidi who said that this Hadith was Mansukh (abrogated) later.
c) Ibn Hazm رحمه الله and the Dhaahirees say that the Ma’mum should follow the Imaam in sitting, if the following condition is satisfied:
- If a Na’ib (assistant i.e. someone sitting next to the Imaam. In the Hadith of Ayesha رضي الله عنها above, Abu Bakr رضي الله عنه was sitting next to the Prophet ﷺ) is present.
It is wrong to say that the Hadith is Mansukh as per the opinion of the majority (opinion no. 2 above), as Bukhari رحمه الله mentioned it in his book (referring to the first Hadith). Why would he mention it if it was Mansukh and why did he not say so? Furthermore, the Prophet ﷺ in the next Hadith, mentioned the reason as to why he asked them to sit, which is that he was injured and he did not want them to be like the Romans and the Christians who stood for their kings. So how are we to say it is not allowed to copy the Romans and their Christians in their standing for the leader, if this Hadith is Mansukh? This is not possible.
As for the correct opinion according to me, is the last opinion (No. 3) which is one of the opinions to prove the brilliance and intelligence of Ibnu Hazm رحمه الله, as all the evidences in the Sahihain and others agree with this opinion. So the correct way is that the Ma’mum should sit, if the Imaam is sitting and there is a Naaib next to him.
Wallaahu ta’ala A’lam
Answered by Ahmad Banajah
Transcribed by Abu Abdillaah Muhammad Rifkhan